Search:      

Click here for translation   

 


Criminal Justice

Since 1989, ISDLS has worked to assist countries to introduce modernizations that streamline legal processes and reduce backlog and delay in civil, and more recently, criminal courts.

Court systems worldwide struggle with the pervasive problem of backlog. As growing numbers of cases are brought before criminal courts, the resources available to be used in resolving these cases must increase accordingly. When – as is frequently the case – resources are unable to keep pace with expanding criminal dockets, governments must find creative ways to more expeditiously and less expensively resolve cases – or suffer from backlog. Backlog undermines the citizenry’s confidence and government and rule of law, and can prompt parties to seek extrajudicial resolutions to disputes. Furthermore, in the extreme, backlog can result in individuals being held without trial, in violation of their civil and human rights.

Leading legal reformists in the United States have had remarkable success in reducing backlog through the introduction of alternatives to criminal trial into the criminal justice system. (As trials are expensive, slow and adversarial processes, resolving cases out of trial can be a more efficient and satisfactory course of action for all parties). Several alternatives are used in federal and state courts, including plea-bargaining mechanisms, written guilty pleas, and diversion, probation and rehabilitation programs.

ISDLS works at the request of reform-minded governments to introduce alternatives to criminal trial into their legal systems. ISDLS hosts delegations of legal opinion leaders (judges, attorneys, legislators, academicians, and Law Ministry officials) in California and Washington, D.C. to conduct studies of the critical processes. By observing alternatives to criminal trial in practice, meeting with the original architects of the reforms, and drawing upon the expertise of ISDLS’ leading international reform experts, delegates are able to critically assess the trial alternatives and design reforms appropriate to individual cultural and legal contexts. Following in-depth legal studies in the United States, delegates and ISDLS’ legal experts present the adapted and original reforms to larger legal communities in the partner countries. Through series’ of consultation visits ISDLS’ experts assist in the development of legislation and/or pilot programs which introduce alternatives to criminal trial into foreign legal systems.

ISDLS currently is working with the Governments of Egypt, Jordan, Brazil and Turkey to conduct criminal justice reform initiatives.

For more information regarding alternatives to criminal trial used in the United States, please click the links below: